Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 13 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Wooden_Tympanum_at_Entrance_of_Kumari_House-_Basantapur,_Kathmandu_Nepal-0368.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Wooden Tympanum at Entrance of Kumari House- Basantapur, Kathmandu Nepal --Bijay chaurasia 05:11, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Nice.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:50, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I think the top crop is too tight (also the wire rope thing on the lower right is a bit disturbing).--Peulle 13:41, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Peulle - the cutoff on top is the same reason I opposed this photo at FPC. -- Ikan Kekek 02:35, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 11:00, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Anacopia's church 1.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Anacopia's church, New Athos, Abkhazia. --SKas 11:12, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Overexposed/harsh light. --Peulle 20:26, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done Please, look the latest version.--SKas 07:20, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
 Comment I still think it looks too bright, but please feel free to ask for further opinions in CR if you like.--Peulle 21:43, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
CR? What did you mean? --SKas 10:38, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
 Comment Consensual Review. :) --Peulle 17:42, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 11:00, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Oriental_Lizard.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination The oriental garden lizard, eastern garden lizard or changeable lizard (Calotes versicolor) is an agamid lizard found widely distributed in Asia. By User:Azimronnie --Masum-al-hasan 07:56, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --SKas 09:42, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Quality of photograph acceptable (DoF could be better), but categories (species) must be improved. --XRay 11:25, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
  • I agree. Categories (species) must be improved. --SKas 08:35, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
  • I categorized so far. I think that at the moment it is enough for assignment of QI.  Support --SKas 09:00, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment SKas, I crossed out your second 'vote!' since you can only vote once. --cart-Talk 11:07, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Categories OK. --XRay 19:24, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Spurzem 07:40, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 11:02, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Zinnia_angustifolia_Canary_Bird_NBG_LR.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Zinnia angustifolia Canary Bird NBG --PumpkinSky 23:32, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  SupportGood quality. --Vengolis 00:01, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not sharp enough and an uninteresting light situation --Ermell 12:36, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Ermell and Chromatic aberration. --SKas 06:44, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 11:02, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Junonia_coenia_Common_Buckeye_2_NBG_LR.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Junonia coenia Common Buckeye 2 NBG --PumpkinSky 23:32, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 00:06, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Should be cropped better and turned round. --Ermell 12:35, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment @Ermell: I can change the crop but what exactly do you mean by turned round? PumpkinSky 11:14, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
    •  Comment I mean the butterfly should be turned round which is unfixable. Sorry for the unclear comment.
      •  Comment Well, you know how it is with wild animals, you can't pose them ;-) PumpkinSky 15:49, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support The image maybe could be better but the butterfly is entirely sharp. OK for me. --Basotxerri 20:11, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
    •  Comment I've upload another crop. PumpkinSky 23:12, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
      •  Comment - I would suggest a further crop, to remove the unsharp part of a flower at the bottom right. I find that distracting enough to oppose the photo but will hold off on opposing if you'll try the crop. -- Ikan Kekek 00:23, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
      •  Comment @Ikan Kekek: Sure, when I get back to my LR computer later today. If you want to add an image note for a suggested crop, feel free. I think chopping off mostly from the bottom with a tiny bit on the sides would work. I think if I crop off too much from the sides it'd be too tight (ie, to the inside of the blur you're talking about would be too tight). PumpkinSky 12:05, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support - Thanks. I think the photo is good enough for QI now. -- Ikan Kekek 02:05, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 13:52, 12 August 2017 (UTC)