Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcut: COM:VIC

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

How to nominate an image for VI status

[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination.

Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)

[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this: 

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.

Renomination

[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in 

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with 

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review

[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list: 

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where Scope is the scope of both images, and candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates

[edit]

How to review an image

[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure

[edit]
  • On the review page the image is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
 You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
 You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  •  Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
 You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.
How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period

[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates

[edit]
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
55,838 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
 50,232 (90%) 
Undecided
  
 3,107 (5.6%) 
Declined
  
 2,499 (4.5%) 


New valued image nominations

[edit]
   

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Sigamix (talk) on 2024-07-27 22:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Power lines in France
  •  Comment Must connect the scope to the category or gallery that contains the image. It would be better to specify Electric pylons in the Drôme seen from the Chem. des Joncs, Pierrelatte..--Pierre André (talk) 10:08, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-07-29 15:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Mercenaria campechiensis (Southern Quahog), right valve
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 04:20, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-07-29 15:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Mercenaria campechiensis (Southern Quahog), left valve
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 04:20, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
GRDN711 (talk) on 2024-07-29 18:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Astrid - MMSI 230998670
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 04:20, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-07-30 05:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Ancient Roman statues in the Museo archeologico nazionale (Venice) - Artemis
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-07-30 05:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Palazzo dei Trecento of Treviso, Italy. Monumental wooden monastic lectern.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-07-30 05:05 (UTC)
Scope:
The Marriage of the Virgin by Alonso Cano - Goya Museum
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
ReneeWrites (talk) on 2024-07-30 06:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Grafmonument Engelbrecht I van Nassau - Maria van Loon-Heinsberg and John IV of Nassau with saints
Used in:
nl:Maria van Loon-Heinsberg
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
August (talk) on 2024-07-30 09:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Station Trebsen (Mulde)
Used in:
Reason:
I think it shows the most precise and detailed view of this old station building (cultural heritage monument). -- August (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Atudu (talk) on 30 July 2024
Scope:
Lexias pardalis jadeitina (Myanmarese Yellow-tipped Archduke), dorsal, female
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 04:20, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2024-07-30 12:46 (UTC)
Scope:
1 place de la Libération, Cahors
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2024-07-30 13:08 (UTC)
Scope:
118 rue de la Barre, Cahors
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2024-07-30 13:12 (UTC)
Scope:
12 place Saint-Urcisse, Cahors
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Thi (talk) on 2024-07-30 13:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Agostino Scilla, Epicurus, about 1670–1680, 127 × 96,5 cm.
Used in:
en:Epicurus, es:Ética epicúrea
Reason:
Scilla painted two portraits of Epicurus.[1] Both are oil in canvas paintings and located in private collections, so I included the size on scope. --Thi (talk) 09:55, 31 July 2024 (UTC) -- Thi (talk)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Thi (talk) on 2024-07-30 14:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Bust of Hannah Arendt by Attila Diénes, Budapest 2016.
Used in:
eu:Hannah Arendt, fi:Ideologia, he:חנה ארנדט
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-07-30 16:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Bunker vault des Radcafarads Maulde (Nord), view from rue du Bois
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-07-30 16:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Detail of the monumental work of art Deltawerk // Waterloopbos, formerly Delta Flume. (artists RAAAF en Atelier de Lyon). Space between 2 walls, horizontally connected. We are looking at the northeast.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-07-30 21:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Église Saint-Pierre de Maulde, view from Grande Rue
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rocky Masum (talk) on 2024-07-31 01:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Rajshahi University School Bhaban (front side)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Wilfredor (talk) on 2024-07-31 01:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Portrait of a Man - Antonello da Messina, Louvre MI 693
Used in:
severals pages
Reason:
Best in scope -- Wilfredor (talk)
✓ Done --Wilfredor (talk) 05:20, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Wilfredor (talk) on 2024-07-31 01:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Madonna and child with St Peter and St. Sebastian, by Giovanni Bellini, Louvre (MI 231)
Used in:
severals pages

✓ Done --Wilfredor (talk) 12:48, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Wilfredor (talk) on 2024-07-31 01:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Andromaque et Pyrrhus by Pierre-Narcisse Guérin, (Louvre INV 5183)
Used in:
severals pages
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Wilfredor (talk) on 2024-07-31 01:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Énée et Didon, Guérin, Louvre room 701
Used in:
severals pages
  •  Comment Please note that there are two tables of the same subject with the same title by the same author and the same year. In this case; the collection number must be added so that the scope is acceptable. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Wilfredor (talk) on 2024-07-31 01:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Català: Portrait of a Man - Giovanni Bellini - Louvre RF 1344
Used in:
severals pages
✓ Done Please let me know if its ok --Wilfredor (talk) 23:06, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Wilfredor (talk) on 2024-07-31 01:56 (UTC)
Scope:
The Intervention of the Sabine Women - David (Louvre INV 3691)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Wilfredor (talk) on 2024-07-31 02:05 (UTC)
Scope:
An Officer of the Imperial Horse Guards Charging
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Wilfredor (talk) on 2024-07-31 02:07 (UTC)
Scope:
The Virgin Adoring the Christ Child with St. John the Baptist and Two Angels - Francesco Botticini - Louvre RF 2082
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Wilfredor (talk) on 2024-07-31 02:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Blessing Christ, by Giovanni Bellini, Louvre RF 2039
Reason:
best in scope -- Wilfredor (talk)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Wilfredor (talk) on 2024-07-31 03:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Cupid and Psyche, by François-Édouard Picot, louvre Room 702
Reason:
best in scope -- Wilfredor (talk)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Wilfredor (talk) on 2024-07-31 03:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Bacchus, by Leonardo da Vinci workshop, Louvre INV 780
Reason:
best in scope -- Wilfredor (talk)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Wilfredor (talk) on 2024-07-31 03:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Death of Sardanapalus, by Eugène Delacroix, Louvre room 700
Reason:
best in scope -- Wilfredor (talk)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Wilfredor (talk) on 2024-07-31 03:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Portrait of a Woman, Leonardo da Vinci, Louvre INV 778
Reason:
best in scope -- Wilfredor (talk)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Wilfredor (talk) on 2024-07-31 04:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Pala Jacopi, by Lorenzo di Cred, Louvre Room 710
Reason:
best in scope -- Wilfredor (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
J. Lunau (talk) on 2024-07-31 13:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Lohe (Eckersdorf), village view, view direction west
Used in:
de:Schanz (Eckersdorf), Wikidata Schanz (Q28382658)

Scope changed from Schanz (Eckersdorf), town view to Schanz (Eckersdorf), village view, view direction west --J. Lunau (talk) 12:26, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Wilfredor (talk) on 2024-07-31 14:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Raphaël au Vatican (Louvre INV 8365)
Reason:
best in scope -- Wilfredor (talk)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Wilfredor (talk) on 2024-07-31 14:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Napoleon on the Battlefield of Eylau (Antoine-Jean Gros), Louvre room 700
Reason:
best in scope -- Wilfredor (talk)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Wilfredor (talk) on 2024-07-31 14:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Marius défait les Cimbres by Alexandre-Gabriel Décamps, (Louvre RF 1940)
Reason:
best in scope -- Wilfredor (talk)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Wilfredor (talk) on 2024-07-31 15:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Madonna and Child with a Dove - Piero di Cosimo - Louvre INV 817
Reason:
best in the scope, by far better than any uploaded version -- Wilfredor (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Wilfredor (talk) on 2024-07-31 15:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Nursing Madonna - Bartolomeo Vivarini - Louvre RF 2011-51
Reason:
best in scope -- Wilfredor (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Wilfredor (talk) on 2024-07-31 16:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Madonna and Child with Two Angels - Pietro Perugino - Louvre INV 719
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-07-31 17:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Koelwatervijver Maasvlakte-Centrale (M1193/M1217) Waterloopbos, We look at the restoration of the Koelwater Vijver Maasvlakte-Centrale.
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Wilfredor (talk) on 2024-07-31 17:15 (UTC)
Scope:
CL'Âme brisant les liens qui l'attachent à la terre, by Pierre-Paul Prud'hon, Louvre room 700
  •  Comment The scope is not great. There is a typo, the author's name is missing, only the museum name is required (Department of Paintings) is not useful.(...comment done by Archaeodontosaurus
✓ Done Please let me know what do you think
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Thi (talk) on 2024-07-31 17:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Watson Heston, Two Ways to Go
Used in:
en:Freethought, en:Watson Heston
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Wilfredor (talk) on 2024-07-31 18:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Scène des massacres de Scio, Louvre room 700
Reason:
best in scope -- Wilfredor (talk)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Wilfredor (talk) on 2024-07-31 20:23 (UTC)
Scope:
The Sleep of Endymion - Girodet (Louvre INV 4935)
Reason:
best in scope -- Wilfredor (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Wilfredor (talk) on 2024-07-31 21:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Christ at the Column by Antonello da Messina (Louvre RF 1992-10)
Reason:
best in scope -- Wilfredor (talk)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Wilfredor (talk) on 2024-07-31 22:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Don Juan by Eugène Delacroix
Reason:
best in scope -- Wilfredor (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
GRDN711 (talk) on 2024-08-01 03:38 (UTC)
Scope:
USCGC Hickory (WLB-212) – port (left) view
Reason:
Best port view of this United States Coast Guard cutter by name. -- GRDN711 (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Thi (talk) on 2024-08-01 09:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Lucretius pointing to the casus by Michael Burghers
Used in:
en:Lucretius, en:De rerum natura, en:Atomism
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-01 17:54 (UTC)
Scope:
L'album di Daumier 1924 - Alberto Martini
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-01 17:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Ca' Pesaro (Venice) - Interior - Busto di Giuseppe La Masa
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-01 17:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Jacopo Tintoretto Ritratto di un ambasciatore (Pinacoteca Querini Stampalia)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Filipny (talk) on 2024-08-01 21:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Jan Bieszczad - Pożar Jasła w 1826 r.
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Wilfredor (talk) on 2024-08-01 22:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Català: Santa Grata accoglie le spoglie di Sant'Alessandro, by Ponziano Loverini (Vatican Museums)
Reason:
best in scope -- Wilfredor (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-08-02 04:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Flower of one Geranium palustre.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-02 04:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Funerary stele dedicated to Olympiodorus Greek antiquities in the Museo Archeologico Nazionale (Venice)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-02 04:42 (UTC)
Scope:
The Visitation by Alonso Cano - Goya Museum

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 12:42, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-02 04:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Giovane pastore che suona il flauto (Pinacoteca Querini Stampalia)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-08-02 09:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Moulin des huttes (Gravelines), view from Rue des Hems de Saint-Pol
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-08-02 12:41 (UTC)
Scope:
BMW i4 - right rear view
Used in:
hu:BMW i4
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Thi (talk) on 2024-08-02 19:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Portrait of Charles Darwin by John Collier, 1883
Used in:
Charles Darwin, History of science
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Thi (talk) on 2024-08-02 20:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Three Arrows election poster of the Social Democratic Party of Germany, 1932 - Gegen Papen, Hitler, Thälmann
Used in:
en:Anti-communism, en:Anti-Stalinist left, en:Three Arrows
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Thi (talk) on 2024-08-02 20:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Lucien Greaves
Used in:
en:The Satanic Temple, en:Lucien Greaves
Open for review.



Pending Most valued review candidates

[edit]

Trithemis annulata (Violet dropwing) female, lateral view

[edit]
   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Zzzs (talk) on 2024-06-17 21:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Trithemis annulata (Violet dropwing) female, lateral view
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 04:20, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Zzzs (talk) on 2024-06-17 21:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Trithemis annulata (Violet dropwing) female, lateral view
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 04:20, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidates

[edit]
   
Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Valued_image_candidates&oldid=751225986"