<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Meta’s LLaMa 2 license is not Open Source	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://opensource.org/blog/metas-llama-2-license-is-not-open-source/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://opensource.org/blog/metas-llama-2-license-is-not-open-source</link>
	<description>The steward of the Open Source Definition, setting the foundation for the Open Source Software ecosystem.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 May 2024 17:22:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<atom:link rel="hub" href="https://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="https://pubsubhubbub.superfeedr.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="https://websubhub.com/hub"/>	<item>
		<title>
		By: Meta no para de presumir de que la IA de Llama es Open Source. Eso no es del todo cierto		</title>
		<link>https://opensource.org/blog/metas-llama-2-license-is-not-open-source#comment-5712</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Meta no para de presumir de que la IA de Llama es Open Source. Eso no es del todo cierto]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2024 17:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.opensource.org/?p=4436#comment-5712</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] de evaluación y la documentación. Sin embargo, Los responsables de la Open Source Initiative dejaron claro dos días después del lanzamiento que Llama 2 no podía ser considerado totalmente Open [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] de evaluación y la documentación. Sin embargo, Los responsables de la Open Source Initiative dejaron claro dos días después del lanzamiento que Llama 2 no podía ser considerado totalmente Open [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Open Foundation Models: Implications of Contemporary Artificial Intelligence &#124; Center for Security and Emerging Technology		</title>
		<link>https://opensource.org/blog/metas-llama-2-license-is-not-open-source#comment-5297</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Open Foundation Models: Implications of Contemporary Artificial Intelligence &#124; Center for Security and Emerging Technology]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2024 13:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.opensource.org/?p=4436#comment-5297</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] is open-source, but open models can have licenses that diverge from those criteria (e.g., Meta’s LLama 2 models), and therefore should not be considered open-source. The term ‘open-source models’ [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] is open-source, but open models can have licenses that diverge from those criteria (e.g., Meta’s LLama 2 models), and therefore should not be considered open-source. The term ‘open-source models’ [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: AI Alliance: Meta, IBM, Intel, AMD, and NASA Join Forces to Boost Open-Source AI		</title>
		<link>https://opensource.org/blog/metas-llama-2-license-is-not-open-source#comment-4593</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AI Alliance: Meta, IBM, Intel, AMD, and NASA Join Forces to Boost Open-Source AI]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2023 13:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.opensource.org/?p=4436#comment-4593</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] However, Meta&#8217;s efforts have been met with some controversy. The Open Source Initiative criticized the licenses for LLaMA 2 and related AI developments for not being genuinely open-source, as Meta [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] However, Meta&#8217;s efforts have been met with some controversy. The Open Source Initiative criticized the licenses for LLaMA 2 and related AI developments for not being genuinely open-source, as Meta [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lo próximo de Meta sería Code Llama, una IA de código abierto para ayudarte a programar &#8211; Internet en Vallebro		</title>
		<link>https://opensource.org/blog/metas-llama-2-license-is-not-open-source#comment-4592</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lo próximo de Meta sería Code Llama, una IA de código abierto para ayudarte a programar &#8211; Internet en Vallebro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2023 17:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.opensource.org/?p=4436#comment-4592</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] sobre Code Llama. Recientemente, la Open Source Initiative aseveró que la licencia de LLaMA 2 no es de código abierto. Esto, debido a que restringe su uso comercial a ciertos usuarios, así como su implementación [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] sobre Code Llama. Recientemente, la Open Source Initiative aseveró que la licencia de LLaMA 2 no es de código abierto. Esto, debido a que restringe su uso comercial a ciertos usuarios, así como su implementación [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Luis Villa		</title>
		<link>https://www.openml.fyi/2023-08-20/</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Luis Villa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2023 15:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.opensource.org/?p=4436#comment-4591</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Catching up on power, Facebook, and a range of miscellany.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Catching up on power, Facebook, and a range of miscellany.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: kopfkind		</title>
		<link>https://social.opensource.org/@osi/110800128099730557#reblogged-by-110847019174837531</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kopfkind]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2023 07:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.opensource.org/?p=4436#comment-4590</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Meta’s Llama 2 misuses the term “open source” &#8211; AI Commenter		</title>
		<link>https://opensource.org/blog/metas-llama-2-license-is-not-open-source#comment-4589</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Meta’s Llama 2 misuses the term “open source” &#8211; AI Commenter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2023 15:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.opensource.org/?p=4436#comment-4589</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] In the opinion blog post, OSI says: [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] In the opinion blog post, OSI says: [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jose Sabater		</title>
		<link>https://social.opensource.org/@osi/110752729845348545#favorited-by-110824338287417817</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jose Sabater]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2023 07:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.opensource.org/?p=4436#comment-4588</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jose Sabater		</title>
		<link>https://social.opensource.org/@osi/110752729845348545#reblogged-by-110824338287417817</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jose Sabater]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2023 07:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.opensource.org/?p=4436#comment-4587</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tobias Schlauch		</title>
		<link>https://social.opensource.org/@osi/110752729845348545#reblogged-by-109480757492259165</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tobias Schlauch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2023 21:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.opensource.org/?p=4436#comment-4586</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>