<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: ISC License	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://opensource.org/license/isc-license-txt/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://opensource.org/license/isc-license-txt</link>
	<description>The steward of the Open Source Definition, setting the foundation for the Open Source Software ecosystem.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2023 14:09:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<atom:link rel="hub" href="https://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="https://pubsubhubbub.superfeedr.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="https://websubhub.com/hub"/>	<item>
		<title>
		By: sinuhe		</title>
		<link>https://opensource.org/license/isc-license-txt#comment-277</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sinuhe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://opensource.org/isc-license-txt/#comment-277</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;and/or&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The original ISC license said &quot;and distribute.&quot; My understanding is that this addition was requested by rms for approval by the FSF, (I believe the issue was related to Pine, and the interpretation UW used). OpenBSD does not use and/or, but instead uses the ISC license before this was modified. I think it should be clarified that the OpenBSD usage is a valid variation of the ISC License.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>and/or</strong><br />The original ISC license said &#8220;and distribute.&#8221; My understanding is that this addition was requested by rms for approval by the FSF, (I believe the issue was related to Pine, and the interpretation UW used). OpenBSD does not use and/or, but instead uses the ISC license before this was modified. I think it should be clarified that the OpenBSD usage is a valid variation of the ISC License.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
