<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Towards a definition of &#8220;Open Artificial Intelligence&#8221;: First meeting recap	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://opensource.org/blog/towards-a-definition-of-open-artificial-intelligence-first-meeting-recap/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://opensource.org/blog/towards-a-definition-of-open-artificial-intelligence-first-meeting-recap</link>
	<description>The steward of the Open Source Definition, setting the foundation for the Open Source Software ecosystem.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2024 13:36:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<atom:link rel="hub" href="https://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="https://pubsubhubbub.superfeedr.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="https://websubhub.com/hub"/>	<item>
		<title>
		By: Mer Joyce: Voices of the Open Source AI Definition &#8211; Open Source Initiative		</title>
		<link>https://opensource.org/blog/towards-a-definition-of-open-artificial-intelligence-first-meeting-recap#comment-5815</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mer Joyce: Voices of the Open Source AI Definition &#8211; Open Source Initiative]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2024 13:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.opensource.org/?p=4294#comment-5815</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] OSI started researching the topic in 2022, and in 2023 began the co-design process of a new definition of Open Source that applies to AI. The OSI hired [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] OSI started researching the topic in 2022, and in 2023 began the co-design process of a new definition of Open Source that applies to AI. The OSI hired [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: How to Regulate Unsecured “Open-Source” AI: No Exemptions &#8211; Politixia		</title>
		<link>https://opensource.org/blog/towards-a-definition-of-open-artificial-intelligence-first-meeting-recap#comment-4225</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[How to Regulate Unsecured “Open-Source” AI: No Exemptions &#8211; Politixia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2023 04:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.opensource.org/?p=4294#comment-4225</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] operating outside the law and thus don’t care about license terms. Open source is also not yet a clearly-defined term for AI, with some rightly pointing out that openness is a spectrum, not a binary distinction, [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] operating outside the law and thus don’t care about license terms. Open source is also not yet a clearly-defined term for AI, with some rightly pointing out that openness is a spectrum, not a binary distinction, [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ​T0╳F03Æ                       		</title>
		<link>https://snug.moe/notes/9hviu4w6ga4vqq57</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[​T0╳F03Æ                       ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2023 14:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.opensource.org/?p=4294#comment-4224</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&quot;https://pleroma.envs.net/users/Seirdy&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;@Seirdy&lt;/a&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt;I figured. You’re looking at this with the lens of the FSF, which was forged in the late 70s with source-compilation-binary chain in mind. We’re talking about man made horrors within our comprehension things that are much much &lt;strong&gt;different&lt;/strong&gt; than that. Go chat with abomination developers, you’ll discover why osi is spending so much time and energy to find what Open means and what freedoms one should demand, in practice.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.opensource.org/towards-a-definition-of-open-artificial-intelligence-first-meeting-recap/&quot; rel=&quot;ugc nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://indieweb.org/POSSE&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://social.opensource.org/@ed/110749197935118988&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.maffulli.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://pleroma.envs.net/users/Seirdy" rel="nofollow ugc">@Seirdy</a> </p>
<blockquote><p>I figured. You’re looking at this with the lens of the FSF, which was forged in the late 70s with source-compilation-binary chain in mind. We’re talking about man made horrors within our comprehension things that are much much <strong>different</strong> than that. Go chat with abomination developers, you’ll discover why osi is spending so much time and energy to find what Open means and what freedoms one should demand, in practice.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="https://blog.opensource.org/towards-a-definition-of-open-artificial-intelligence-first-meeting-recap/" rel="ugc nofollow"></a><br />
<a href="https://indieweb.org/POSSE" rel="nofollow ugc"></a><br />
<a href="https://social.opensource.org/@ed/110749197935118988" rel="nofollow ugc"></a><br />
<a href="https://www.maffulli.net/" rel="nofollow ugc"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ​T0╳F03Æ                       		</title>
		<link>https://snug.moe/notes/9hviou7rinpgsujc</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[​T0╳F03Æ                       ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2023 14:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.opensource.org/?p=4294#comment-4223</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&quot;https://pleroma.envs.net/users/Seirdy&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;@Seirdy&lt;/a&gt; how in the fuck can one define an open source machine learning model - by excluding training data… When training data is most of what could be called a source of it….. That’s like saying a binary only release is open source….Because you can still mod it…
&lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.opensource.org/towards-a-definition-of-open-artificial-intelligence-first-meeting-recap/&quot; rel=&quot;ugc nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://indieweb.org/POSSE&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://social.opensource.org/@ed/110749197935118988&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.maffulli.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://pleroma.envs.net/users/Seirdy" rel="nofollow ugc">@Seirdy</a> how in the fuck can one define an open source machine learning model &#8211; by excluding training data… When training data is most of what could be called a source of it….. That’s like saying a binary only release is open source….Because you can still mod it…<br />
<a href="https://blog.opensource.org/towards-a-definition-of-open-artificial-intelligence-first-meeting-recap/" rel="ugc nofollow"></a><br />
<a href="https://indieweb.org/POSSE" rel="nofollow ugc"></a><br />
<a href="https://social.opensource.org/@ed/110749197935118988" rel="nofollow ugc"></a><br />
<a href="https://www.maffulli.net/" rel="nofollow ugc"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: vamanimal@void.rehab		</title>
		<link>https://void.rehab/notes/9hvfx3q6y2jli3us</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vamanimal@void.rehab]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2023 12:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.opensource.org/?p=4294#comment-4222</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&quot;https://pleroma.envs.net/users/Seirdy&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;@Seirdy&lt;/a&gt; wait wtf proprietary models are open source now?me and the girls on our way to overthrow capitalism <img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/15.0.3/72x72/1faf6.png" alt="🫶" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />
&lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.opensource.org/towards-a-definition-of-open-artificial-intelligence-first-meeting-recap/&quot; rel=&quot;ugc nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://indieweb.org/POSSE&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://social.opensource.org/@ed/110749197935118988&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.maffulli.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://pleroma.envs.net/users/Seirdy" rel="nofollow ugc">@Seirdy</a> wait wtf proprietary models are open source now?me and the girls on our way to overthrow capitalism 🫶<br />
<a href="https://blog.opensource.org/towards-a-definition-of-open-artificial-intelligence-first-meeting-recap/" rel="ugc nofollow"></a><br />
<a href="https://indieweb.org/POSSE" rel="nofollow ugc"></a><br />
<a href="https://social.opensource.org/@ed/110749197935118988" rel="nofollow ugc"></a><br />
<a href="https://www.maffulli.net/" rel="nofollow ugc"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Seirdy		</title>
		<link>https://pleroma.envs.net/notice/AYHDFEHrdjIPEyrbJw</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seirdy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2023 12:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.opensource.org/?p=4294#comment-4221</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.opensource.org/towards-a-definition-of-open-artificial-intelligence-first-meeting-recap/&quot; rel=&quot;ugc nofollow&quot;&gt;Towards a definition of “Open Artificial Intelligence”: First meeting recap&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.maffulli.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;Stefano Maffulli&lt;/a&gt; The Open-Source Initiative (OSI) is planning to form a definition of “Open Artificial Intelligence” (not to be confused with OpenAI, a company selling proprietary autocomplete software whose technical details only grow less open with each iteration). Unfortunately, odds of the definition requiring the release of training data are slim: &lt;a href=&quot;https://social.opensource.org/@ed/110749197935118988&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;the OSI’s executive director isn’t keen on the idea&lt;/a&gt; himself.I see libre/open-source software as a means to reduce dependence on a vendor, and mitigate the risk of &lt;a href=&quot;https://seirdy.one/posts/2021/01/27/whatsapp-and-the-domestication-of-users/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;user domestication&lt;/a&gt;. As long as training data is out of the community’s reach, it’s impossible for the vendor to be replaced. Yes, it’s possible to customize or re-train the model, but the vendor remains in control of its future development.Recent decades have tested the effectiveness of liberating source code as a defense against user domestication, &lt;a href=&quot;https://seirdy.one/posts/2021/02/23/keeping-platforms-open/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;as I explain in another blog post&lt;/a&gt;. But to re-define Open Source to allow labelling a model that is impossible to competitively fork would be to miss the whole value of FOSS in my eyes: to allow users to own not just their tools, but those tools’ futures.&lt;a href=&quot;https://indieweb.org/POSSE&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;POSSE&lt;/a&gt; note form &lt;a href=&quot;https://seirdy.one/notes/2023/07/31/open-artificial-intelligence-misses-the-point/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;https://seirdy.one/notes/2023/07/31/open-artificial-intelligence-misses-the-point/&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://indieweb.org/POSSE&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://social.opensource.org/@ed/110749197935118988&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.maffulli.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.opensource.org/towards-a-definition-of-open-artificial-intelligence-first-meeting-recap/&quot; rel=&quot;ugc nofollow&quot;&gt;Towards a definition of “Open Artificial Intelligence”: First meeting recap&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reply to <a href="https://blog.opensource.org/towards-a-definition-of-open-artificial-intelligence-first-meeting-recap/" rel="ugc nofollow">Towards a definition of “Open Artificial Intelligence”: First meeting recap</a> by <a href="https://www.maffulli.net/" rel="nofollow ugc">Stefano Maffulli</a> The Open-Source Initiative (OSI) is planning to form a definition of “Open Artificial Intelligence” (not to be confused with OpenAI, a company selling proprietary autocomplete software whose technical details only grow less open with each iteration). Unfortunately, odds of the definition requiring the release of training data are slim: <a href="https://social.opensource.org/@ed/110749197935118988" rel="nofollow ugc">the OSI’s executive director isn’t keen on the idea</a> himself.I see libre/open-source software as a means to reduce dependence on a vendor, and mitigate the risk of <a href="https://seirdy.one/posts/2021/01/27/whatsapp-and-the-domestication-of-users/" rel="nofollow ugc">user domestication</a>. As long as training data is out of the community’s reach, it’s impossible for the vendor to be replaced. Yes, it’s possible to customize or re-train the model, but the vendor remains in control of its future development.Recent decades have tested the effectiveness of liberating source code as a defense against user domestication, <a href="https://seirdy.one/posts/2021/02/23/keeping-platforms-open/" rel="nofollow ugc">as I explain in another blog post</a>. But to re-define Open Source to allow labelling a model that is impossible to competitively fork would be to miss the whole value of FOSS in my eyes: to allow users to own not just their tools, but those tools’ futures.<a href="https://indieweb.org/POSSE" rel="nofollow ugc">POSSE</a> note form <a href="https://seirdy.one/notes/2023/07/31/open-artificial-intelligence-misses-the-point/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://seirdy.one/notes/2023/07/31/open-artificial-intelligence-misses-the-point/</a><br />
<a href="https://indieweb.org/POSSE" rel="nofollow ugc"></a><br />
<a href="https://social.opensource.org/@ed/110749197935118988" rel="nofollow ugc"></a><br />
<a href="https://www.maffulli.net/" rel="nofollow ugc"></a><br />
<a href="https://blog.opensource.org/towards-a-definition-of-open-artificial-intelligence-first-meeting-recap/" rel="ugc nofollow">Towards a definition of “Open Artificial Intelligence”: First meeting recap</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rohan Kumar		</title>
		<link>https://seirdy.one/notes/2023/07/31/open-artificial-intelligence-misses-the-point/</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rohan Kumar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2023 05:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.opensource.org/?p=4294#comment-4220</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Open-Source Initiative (OSI) is planning to form a definition of “Open Artificial Intelligence” (not to be confused with OpenAI, a company selling]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Open-Source Initiative (OSI) is planning to form a definition of “Open Artificial Intelligence” (not to be confused with OpenAI, a company selling</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ana Jimenez		</title>
		<link>https://ospo-news.ghost.io/osponews-from-the-todo-group-issue-23-2/</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ana Jimenez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2023 09:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.opensource.org/?p=4294#comment-4219</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/15.0.3/72x72/2728.png" alt="✨" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> Monthly Announcements




Join the OSPO expert-led panel discussions, presentations, and roundtable sessions

OSPOlogyLive Germany brings together different stakeholder groups engaging in open source, including industry leaders, open source project maintainers, and policymakers, for a day of insightful expert-led panel discussions, presentations, and roundtable/workshop sessions.

Together, we&#039;ll gain insights into]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>✨ Monthly Announcements</p>
<p>Join the OSPO expert-led panel discussions, presentations, and roundtable sessions</p>
<p>OSPOlogyLive Germany brings together different stakeholder groups engaging in open source, including industry leaders, open source project maintainers, and policymakers, for a day of insightful expert-led panel discussions, presentations, and roundtable/workshop sessions.</p>
<p>Together, we&#8217;ll gain insights into</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Meta&#039;s &#039;Open Source&#039; AI Raises Questions About Accessibility		</title>
		<link>https://opensource.org/blog/towards-a-definition-of-open-artificial-intelligence-first-meeting-recap#comment-4218</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Meta&#039;s &#039;Open Source&#039; AI Raises Questions About Accessibility]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2023 12:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.opensource.org/?p=4294#comment-4218</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] OSI is currently leading a series of meetings and debates and accepting proposals to formally define what open source means when it comes to AI and the [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] OSI is currently leading a series of meetings and debates and accepting proposals to formally define what open source means when it comes to AI and the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neo@tooot.im		</title>
		<link>https://social.opensource.org/@osi/110716467798320517#favorited-by-110638883717799827</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neo@tooot.im]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2023 18:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.opensource.org/?p=4294#comment-4217</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
